The Richmond Factor
Danny Richmond (Photo by Kyle Mace)
After the meltdown formerly known as the Sunday game against Norfolk, my girlfriend (in a semi-kidding sort of way) said “We would have won if they’d have played Danny Richmond.” She kind of has a thing for him and has declared him to be her favorite. Don’t get me wrong. She’s no puck bunny. She has been studying the game in depth and is a big help when I am tweeting a game. She’s a true hockey lover. As we were on our way home, I started thinking about it more. Could there be something to this? Richmond has seen limited action this year. Including this past weekend, he has seen action in just 12 games. The limited playing time is at least in part due to the AHL’s “veteran rule”.
The rule as described by the AHL:
What is the AHL’s development rule?
In the AHL, player development is a top priority. The American Hockey League and the Professional Hockey Players’ Association have the following development rule in place for the 2011-12 season:
Of the 18 skaters (not counting two goaltenders) that teams may dress for a regular-season game, at least 13 must be qualified as “development players.” Of those 13, 12 must have played in 260 or fewer professional games (including AHL, NHL, IHL and European elite leagues), and one must have played in 320 or fewer professional games. All calculations for development status are based on regular-season totals as of the start of the season.
The Bears have played 29 games resulting in a record thus far of 16-8-3-2. For those of you new to the standings, that would be 16 wins, 8 losses, 3 overtime losses and 2 shootout losses.
Now that we have a baseline, let’s take a look at the twelve games that Richmond has played. If you want to look at it in terms of a pure win/loss, they are 7-5 which isn’t a stellar case for the “Richmond Factor.” So let’s break it down the same way the AHL does. The Bears record when Richmond plays is 7-2-2-1. Out of twelve games, the Bears have only lost 2 games in regulation when Richmond is in the lineup. To put it another way, there are only two games in which Danny has played where the Bears didn’t earn any points in the standings.
Richmond has been a healthy scratch while there are games like Sunday night where the defense just fell apart. The defense continues to be an issue with this team. Out of the 13 games that the Bears have lost, they have scored three or more goals six times. It used to be true that when you scored three or more goals in a game there was a good chance you were winning that one. Out of 29 games played, there have been a whopping 17 that the Bears have given up three or more goals. They ended up losing 12 of those.
Richmond doesn’t have the best stat sheet, but maybe it’s the ‘intangibles’ that he brings. He’s a veteran, and has plenty of game experience to back that up. His +1 rating isn’t great by any means, but that would still put him in a tie for fourth among defensemen. Maybe there’s something to the “Richmond Factor” or maybe not. I thought it would be fun to look at especially with a struggling defense. The last two Calder Cup winning Bears teams had strong leadership on the blue line. Of course there’s also the old cliché that offense wins games, but defense wins championships. The Bears have 17 standing points in 12 games when Richmond plays (averaging 1.42 standings points earned per game). They have a .708 winning percentage versus an overall .638. Without Richmond in the lineup, that winning percentage drops to .625 (and average standings points per game drops to 1.25).
So maybe you buy into the fact that Richmond should be in the lineup. Who do you scratch? It would have to be another ‘veteran’ which you aren’t going to find on the defense. Richmond is the only one. You are going to have to sit a veteran forward. Certainly not either of the top two scorers in the league in Keith Aucoin or Chris Bourque. Probably not Jacob Micflikier who is 5th in the league in scoring. Who does that leave us with? Boyd Kane, DJ King, Graham Mink, Ryan Potulny and Kyle Greentree. Greentree is still injured, but should be back soon (which presents even more problems for veterans). King is also still injured, so that leaves us with Potulny, Kane and Mink. One (Kane) wears a C on his chest and another (Mink) wears an A for home games. Mink is also tops in the league for power play goals. Potulny was hurt for part of the season, but in December he currently stands with 14 points (6G-8A-14Pts) in 9 games plays this month. As you can see, not a lot of room for Richmond to crack the lineup, but when he’s in there the Bears have a better record.
In a game like this past Sunday against Norfolk, Richmond may have been the difference. It was the only game that he didn’t play this season against Norfolk. Before Sunday, they Bears were 3-0-1-0 against the Admirals. It was also one of five games this season that the Bears have lost by 2 or more goals. Richmond was only in for one of those five.
Unfortunately, no matter what the stats say, there is a limit to how many veterans that can play each game. Richmond seems to be the odd man out, but he could be part of the solution to the struggling defensive corps.
Comments are closed.
[…] might be getting on board with the Danny Richmond Factor. […]
[…] As you can imagine it was a relatively quiet week with the Christmas break. In case you missed The Richmond Factor last week, go check that out. With Danny Richmond in the lineup for both games, the Bears beat the […]
Richmond Factor seemed to do it again tonight!!! Oh, and how ABOUT THAT ASSIST!!!!!!
AJ…not saying I agree with SHOE’s assessment but as far as quality of opponent…it is actually the opposite. Danny has been in the lineup against Norfolk 4 times, Wilkes-Barre 2 times, BPort (who was good for a while) 3 times, and Connecticut, Syracuse, and Albany all 1 time each. Maybe not a murderers row but 6 times against the co division leaders is pretty good.
I think the point that is missing is that he is limited offensively. I don’t think he is any more of a liability in the defensive end as some of the other defensemen but offensively he has only 1 assist this season.
He has played better of late though. In 5 of his last 6 games he has not been on the ice for a goal against.
As for who to sit…thats tough. You mention Micflikier in your post but I am pretty sure he is not considered an AHL veteran at this stage in his career. And Greentree is somewhat immune to this discussion as he falls into the Veteran “Exempt” category (260-320 games played) as he has yet to play in 320 games.
Richmond is going to be the odd man out most nights because the other players are key contributors on the offensive side and there are other defenseman who at least appear to do what he does, and maybe more than him in the offensive end.
The Bears are one of the best teams in the league when they take a lead into the 1st or 2nd intermission. Sunday’s game was the exception…not the rule.
I stand corrected on Micflikier. On the list that I was looking at it had him marked as a veteran. I didn’t verify that.
I would also concede that Richmond doesn’t have the offensive numbers that some of his counterparts do. But for whatever reason, the team as a whole has been better with him, than they have been without him. As you said, they seem to be using him in some of the more important games. In some cases it’s against division leaders. Then there are games like last night when they needed a ‘statement win’. The Syracuse Crunch aren’t a great team this year, but the Bears needed to come back after Sunday’s disaster. The defense let them down in that game, and while we haven’t seen collapses like that prior to Sunday, the defense is still a big question mark for this team.
I realize that there are plenty more stats that we can come up with to either support Richmond or not, but I think we can agree that this team, especially late in games, needs to find a way to hold off the opponent. Is that answer Richmond? Maybe or maybe not. It’s not for me to decide, but I am interested in seeing how my hypothesis plays out the rest of the season. The trade deadline might get interesting, too.
Richmond is not part of the solution. He is part of the problem. I’m sorry that I disagree with you but one thing you fail to take into account is quality of the opponent.
First, I believe that the Bears have played Richmond during games which were generally less significant. Second, Richmond on the ice appears slow, undisciplined, and unable to puckhandle well.
The Bears have been plagued by call-ups and injuries since the start of the season and just recently have been heating up as they’ve been healing up. As of this point, all I want for Christmas is a Richmond healthy-scratch.
AJ, I appreciate your opinion. As Greg pointed out, Richmond has been in there for some quality games and has been pretty good in the month of December. As for your Christmas wish, I guess it didn’t come true. Richmond was in the game last night. Maybe not a high quality opponent, but it was a game where they needed to come back and prove a point after Sunday. They couldn’t afford another showing like that. I wasn’t able to attend the game, but I did listen to it. It didn’t sound like there were as many defensive mistakes last night. Looking at the game summary, Richmond had an assist and was +2 on the night. He was also on the ice for the last PP goal which doesn’t show in the +/- stats. Not a bad night for him or the team. Stuccio commented more than once how the defense was working well in keeping the Crunch to the outside. They were allowing Sabourin to see clearly most of the shots. The Crunch weren’t allowed to have many ‘quality’ scoring chances from inside the hash marks. All in all it sounded like a good game for the Bears all around. So while you didn’t get your Christmas wish, the Bears win that was on my list came true. 🙂